Published by on September 18, 2021
Categories: Career

Ethical Intuitionism is a book (hardcover release: , paperback release: ) by University of Colorado philosophy professor Michael Huemer. Michael Huemer. University of Colorado, Boulder. Abstract. This book defends a form of ethical intuitionism, according to which (i) there are objective moral. In recent years there has been a resurgence of interest in Ethical Intuitionism, ( ), Bedke (), Huemer (), Shafer-Landau (), Stratton-lake.

Author: Akijinn Fek
Country: Trinidad & Tobago
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Photos
Published (Last): 21 September 2015
Pages: 472
PDF File Size: 19.33 Mb
ePub File Size: 15.7 Mb
ISBN: 699-9-73890-952-4
Downloads: 15197
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Torn

If you know what yellow is you adequately grasp yellownessthen you can intuit that yellow is a color. Not the least of its merits, however, is that it contains a large element of truth. History of Western Philosophy.

An adequate intutiionism is necessary for one to be justified in this way, but this is not because understanding provides justification; rather, it is because it is needed to get the proposition clearly in view, and so enables a clear intuition intuitionizm it.

Ethical Intuitionism (book) – Wikipedia

In this case, the thing he believes is necessarily true: Thus, suppose someone reports an intuition that abortion is wrong. If the sense of mystery of the intuitionist notion of goodness stems from its unanalysability, then this sense of mystery will not apply to these intuitionists’ concept of goodness, even though it is still a non-naturalist conception.

If people are asked to consider Switch first, and Bridge second, they tend to say that it is permissible to pull the lever in Switch but not permissible to push the man onto the track in Bridge.

This book defends a form of ethical intuitionism, according to which i there are objective moral truths; ii we know some of these truths through a kind of immediate, intellectual awareness, or “intuition”; and iii our knowledge of moral truths gives us ethiacl for action independent of our desires.

Price concedes that certain feelings may attend our apprehension of right and wrong, but these impressions are merely the consequence of our perception of right and wrong. Since there is no king of Colorado, some would say the sentence is false; others would say it is neither true nor false. If they do, then there would seem to be no mystery about the intuitiknism of the good.

Instead, I am ‘seeing’ intellectually that it must be true–that is, when I think about it, it becomes obvious. No other property we know of has such inherent motivational force. Nothing can be accepted intuitilnism we first give a positive reason for trusting that kind of belief.


Notice that the claim is not that all intuitions are true. The same is true if intuitions are inclinations to believe, as Williamson and Sosa see also Earlenbaugh and Molyneux, claim, for the fact that I am inclined to believe some proposition is no justification for believing it. We could then adopt a familiar principle of doxastic conservatism that says that if we are inclined to believe that pwe are justified in so doing, unless countervailing evidence comes to light.


The failure of this inference, in turn, is a victory for skepticism. It is a general problem about a priori knowledge.

In order to show that he really has seen off the opposition, Huemer feels obliged to engage with such sophisticated antagonists intutionism Gibbard, Timmons, and Blackburn.

Bridge seems to be a case where the bad outcome is intended as a means of saving the five. Why does Huemer not go for the simpler solution? If this assumption is correct, then the disputants agree about the moral facts here. Some writers might have been inclined to make the book more exhaustive, and exhausting, but — given his intended audience — I think Huemer was wise to keep it fairly short.

Given that a huener may seem to be self-evident when it is not, we have to have some way of discriminating the merely apparent from the real ones.

Because it seems bad. Among intuitive moral propositions, some are more intuitive than others. Appearances have propositional contents–things they represent to be the case–but they are not beliefs, as can be seen from the intelligibility of, ‘The arch seems to be taller than it is wide, but I don’t think it is’.

It is consistent with this that there be many false intuitions. If one accepts Phenomenal Conservatism, the natural view to take is that the more obvious something seems, the stronger is its prima facie justification. In each case, the appearance is intellectual; you do not perceive that these things are the ethifal with your eyes, ears, etc. We cannot render B false intuitioism changing any conventions, without changing the meaning of B.

But once we remember that one’s beliefs and judgements may conflict with one’s intuitions it is not at all clear that the subjects lack the intuition that it would be permissible to pull the lever in fthical switch case when they say that it would be wrong. One could, without conceptual confusion, debate whether something that causes pleasure is good. It is not the case intuitoinism a nuclear war would be bad.

Huemer’s own positive view is moderately complex. But how would the occurrence of some mere huemre mental state render probable a proposition about the external world? Likewise, in ethical intuition, as a point of phenomenological fact, we find ourselves presented with moral properties and relationships, not with mental states.


So the discussion of intuitionism will focus on just these two features. For Trap Door is like Bridge in the sense that the bystander is killed as a means of saving the five, but many more people tend to have the intuition that it is permissible to pull the lever in Trap Door Greene et al.

One thing worthy of note is that these cases test intuitions about our overall moral judgements—that is, about what we should, or may do in certain circumstances. Some philosophers hold that the morally correct action is always the hemer with the best overall consequences. Grasping comes in degrees: We have evolved to feel instant humeer of acts that benefit our group, such as those that exemplify reciprocal trust, and honesty, and thus intuitionjsm our chances of survival, and to feel disapproval of acts such as deceit, and betrayal, that undermine trust and the benefits that brings.

Intkitionism would have been much simpler to drop the dualism of appearance and belief and interpret ‘seems’ statements in the moral realm doxastically. Consider the following three cases:. Likewise, it is unclear how I might go about checking on the general reliability of memory, without relying on memory; on the reliability of inductive reasoning, without relying on induction; or on the reliability of reason in general, without relying on reason.

So one way to explain the different ethicap in Switch and Bridge is with reference to the doctrine of double effect. Similarly, suppose I say, ‘God is loving’.

He believes that the widget is red…. If this view were true, that would not imply that we could not know whether something was warm, fragile, or coloured. That is enough for me to be justified in believing there is a glass of water, in the absence of any countervailing evidence.

The laws of logic are thus examples of non-conventional, objective facts that are known independently of experience. This is chapter 5 pp.

Although their view is about the nature of moral properties, they often put their point in terms of moral concepts or ideas, and intuitionisk that these concepts are either unanalysable, or if analysable, not analysable wholly in terms of natural concepts.